A U.K. MUDHIEL, MURTAD AGENT OF IBLEES ORGANIZES THE ULTIMATE ACT OF KUFR
RASULULLAH (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that The Hour of Qiyaamah will not come except when the cross is worshipped inside the Mihraab of the Musaajid.
An Ibleesi ‘sheikh’ Mumtaz ul Haq (now –mumtaazush shaitaan- The Majlis), who is the epitome of baatil and kufr, has committed the ultimate act of kufr by inviting a Christian pastor to the Musjid to deliver a sermon of kufr to the musallis. In the sermon of kufr, the Qur’aan Majeed, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and Islam were blasphemed and portrayed as falsehood. The sheikhus shaitaan is directly complicit in this blasphemy.
The issue in this, our article, is not the pastor. We have no bone of contention with the kaafir priest. He was merely doing his job of promoting his kufr which he believes to be the ‘truth’. Our condemnation in the strongest terms is directed to the ‘sheikh’ – Shaikhush Shaitaan – who has lost his Imaan and who has become a murtad for having organized this bayaan of kufr by a kaafir priest inside the Musjid for the consumption of the Muslim audience.
This Ibleesi ‘sheikh’ has initiated the first step of cross-worship in the Musjid mentioned by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). He has set into motion the process of shaitaani desensitization of the Imaan of Muslims. He has begun the process of cross-worship in the Musaajid as predicted by our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). As much as we lament and grief, the cult of cross-worship will incrementally occur in the Musaajid according to the Hadith. Rasulullah’s predictions must necessarily materialize.
Upon us is the obligation to inform and warn Muslims against the kufr which the Agent of Iblees is cunningly introducing in the community from the platform of the Musjid. Several shocked and concerned Muslims from the U.K. have written to us expressing their abhorrence and disbelief over the flagrant kufr which the murtad Agent of Shaitaan has plotted in the Musjid.
One Concerned Brother or Sister, sent us the following comments on this villainous kufr debacle organized by the murtad ‘sheikh’:
THE BROTHER’S LETTER
“As I read an article by Sheikh Mumtazul Haq in Al-Haq condemning Moulana Tariq Jameel for his conciliatory approach towards the “Sahaaba-slandering” Shias, I assume that The Majlis holds him in high regard. I therefore wish to know whether The Majlis endorses the new form of “inter-faith dialogue” he has initiated with a Qur’aan-slandering pastor at his mosque in London. (Our comment:
How is it ever possible for The Majlis to hold in high regard a MURTAD who is engaging in the shaitaaniyat of undermining the Deen right inside the Musjid? How is it possible for you to even hallucinate that we are supporting any type of kufr inter-faith dialogue when we have stated the Haqq of this haraam evil in numerous articles? How were we supposed to know that the fellow who had condemned the Tariq Jameel Dajjaal is the same Iblees who has assumed the role of being an agent of Iblees to undermine Islam from right inside the Musjid? Now that we have been apprized of the true, evil colours of the shaitaan, we state unequivocally that he is a MURTAD on the basis of the fact you have provided. – The Majlis)
The letter continues:
The details of the sheikh’s kufr shenanigans are as follows:
Imaam Mumtaz (Imaam of the Shayaateen – The Majlis) hosted the pastor-led Christian delegation of men and women in what I call the sehn area of the Musjid, where Janaazah Salaah is read, Sunnah and Nafil Salaah are read, and where rows (sufoof) are also often formed for Farz Salaah because the congregation is big. The event was held on November 9 after Esha with Muslim children also present. It was the second such event at the mosque, taking the form of a debate, with Imaam Mumtaz (Imaam of the shayaateem – The Majlis) and the pastor allocated time for speeches, rebuttals and questions from the audience, with the topic this time being “Jesus of the Bible or Isa of the Qur’aan?”.
Even though men and women sat together and despite some shortcomings in his efforts to articulate the Islamic view fully or authoritatively, I have no doubt that the Imaam (the Agent of Iblees – The Majlis) put his best foot forward to promote our religion, and to punch holes in the arguments of the pastor, while explaining that Hazrat Isa alaihis salaam is a Mighty Messenger of Allah, our Rasul, peace be upon him, is the last Prophet and the Qur’aan Majid is the Book of Allah.
You are exceptionally naïve to say the least, to believe that the Agent of Iblees was trying to defend Islam. How is it ever possible for a Shaitaanul Ins to defend Islam and rebut kufr? Instead of ‘punching holes’ in the kaafir’s arguments, the Agent of Iblees has extinguished his Imaan and has engineered shaitaan’s plot to undermine Islam and introduce cross-worship in the Musjid as predicted by Rasulullah –Sallallahu alayhi wasallam – The Majlis)
The letter continues:
Nevertheless, some of us have serious doubts about allowing a pastor to preach kufr upon kufr on the Mosque’s musallahs, and do not believe that it contributes towards religious harmony. While standing on the very place where Sujood is made by the Mu’mineen, the Christians distributed Matthew, the pastor read from it and got the Mu’mineen to read from it as well, while also saying, in a striking tone, that “the word injeel breaks the Qur’aan” and the “words of the Qur’aan are meaningless”.
How was it ever possible for Muslims to sit and have their ears dinned and their hearts polluted with such blasphemy? How could they have spinelessly sat and allow their Imaan to be so rudely jarred with the notorious kufr? Only people in whose hearts lurk kufr are able to sit through such a vile session where Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Qur’aan and Islam are lambasted by a kaafir priest. It was the Fardh obligation of Muslims to have walked out of the Musjid which the Agent of Iblees had transformed into a Christian church with his condonation of the sermon of kufr.-The Majlis)
The letter continues:
On the previous occasion, he said the Qur’aan is “mixed up”. This condemner of the Qur’aan, who spoke of his “growing friendship” with Imaam Mumtaz (the Agent of Iblees –The Majlis) despite their differences and whom Imaam Mumtaz (Shaitaanul Ins – The Majlis) called on us to treat with respect as he was our guest, also put up a theatrical performance of kufr on the musallah where the Janaazah Salaah of Muslims is read, spreading his hands out from time to time to conjure images of “Jesus on the cross”, and warned Muslims not to fall for “false messiahs”, in what appeared to be an indirect but slanderous reference to our Rasul, peace be upon him. The Imaam (the Imaam of shayaateenul ins wal jinn – The Majlis) and some others justify this kufr by pointing out that the “inter-faith dialogue” is an opportunity to win over Christians, that they are “closest” to us compared to people of other faiths and it was not in breach of Shariah as the Christians of Najran had also been hosted in Masjid e Nabawi for a “debate and discussion”.
The justification for kufr propagation by a kaafir priest right inside the Musjid, is termed in the Qur’aan Majeed: ‘Zukhrufil Qawl’ – satanically adorned words designed to deceive and entrap stupid Muslims into shaitaan’s snare of kufr.
Never ever can non-Muslims be won over to Islam with kufr? How is this ever possible when this so-called ‘dialogue’ blasphemes the Qur’aan and Rasulullah –Sallallahu alayhi wasallam? How is it ever possible to bring Christians close to Islam when Islam is portrayed as a false religion by their priest? Furthermore, the vile criticism of Islam was designed for Muslim consumption. The stage was set by the Murtad ‘sheikh’ for bringing Muslims close to Christianity. The argument of bringing the Christians closer to Islam, is satanically moronic, and comes within the scope of the Qur’aanic Aayat:
“Never will the Yahood and Nasaaraa be pleased with you except if you follow their religion. Say: ‘Verily, the guidance of Allah is the only guidance. And, if you follow their vain desires after Knowledge has come to you, then Allah will not be for you a friend nor a helper.”
(Baqarah, Aayat 121)
Continuation of the letter:
“I am among those musallees who remain unconvinced, holding the view that if a Shia cannot stand in the mosque’s parking bay to “slander” the Sahaaba then there is no way a pastor can stand on its musallas and condemn the Qur’aan Majid as “mixed up” and “meaningless”. For me, this is nothing but a case of the Imaam pandering to the pastor and surrendering the musalla for the preaching of pure kufr to Muslim adults and children who, unlike the Sahaaba, know very little about the Qur’aan, bible or other scriptures. This is why the pastor got their attention when he said that many Muslims do not even know the meaning of the word Torah and he will tell them.
(Our comment: Even the Sahaabah who knew much of the Qur’aan and who were the devotees of Islam, were prohibited by Rasulullah –Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) – from reading the Tauraah. Once when Hadhrat Umar –Radhiyallahu anhuc – was reading the Tauraah, our Nabi –Sallallahu alayhi wasallam – severely reprimanded him. There is absolutely no need for any Muslim to know the meaning of the word ‘Tauraah’. It was a stupid shaitaani red herring cast buy the kaafir priest to bamboozle stupid Muslims whom this Mumtazul Baatil Murtad Agent of Iblees had lured into the Trap of Kufr.
Our salvation is reliant solely on believing in the fundamentals of Islam, not ion the nonsense of knowing the meaning of the Tauraah. The propagation of kufr inside a Musjid by a kaafir priest criciicizing and demeaning the Qur’aan Majeed and Rasulullah –Sallallahu alayhi wasallam – is absolutely mind boggling for a Muslim. Wallaah! There are no words in the dictionary and no expletives in the gutter language of hoodlums strong enough to criticize this Agent of Iblees.)
The letter continues:
The da’awah/call to kufr continued after the official “dialogue”, as the Christian missionaries, now fed biryani, seized the opportunity to preach to Muslims on a one-to-one basis rather than just making chit-chat. This, in the very Mosque where Imaam Mumtaz (Imaam of the shayaateen –Mumtazul Kufr- The Majlis) has frequently lamented that Muslims in London are becoming murtads because of the “cunningness” of Christian missionaries. But some ulama may feel that, given the rise in Islamophobia in the UK, what Imam Mumtaz is now doing with the pastor is right, while Moulana Tariq Jameel’s conciliatory approach towards the “Sahaaba-slandering” Shias remains wrong as they are, in fact, “traitors” and “kaafirs” worse than Christian missionaries who slander the Qur’aan. I await clarity. Jazakallah, Wassalaam. (End of the Brother’s letter)
Any molvi who proffers any justification for this act of supreme shaitaaniyat and kufr which this murtad, shaitaanul ins, had organized for the Musjid, joins his rank into the lowest level of the dregs of Jahannam.
It is shockingly surprising that the Ulama in the UK have become so spineless that their tongues and lips have become welded into satanic silence. All of them without exception are of the ‘Dumb Devil’ ilk stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam): “He who remains silent regarding the Haqq is Shaitaan Akhras (a dumb devil).”
It is accepted that the U.K. government following in the footsteps of the communist regime of the now extinct Soviet Union, has enacted draconian anti-Islam laws which are designed for eliminating Islam in the U.K. The objective of these laws despite not specifically mentioned Islam to be the target, is the very same plot of the abolition of religion which the Soviet communists had brutally enforced in the Muslim countries in Central Asia.
However, despite the evil anti-Islam laws, there remains scope for proclaiming the Haqq without adopting our strident tone. Also, to the best of our knowledge, hitherto there is no law compelling Muslims to invite kuffaar priests into the Musaajid to disgorge kufr and to compound their kufr with vile denigration of the Qur’aan, our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and our Qur’aan. How was it possible for Muslims to sit and devour ‘biryani’ with such enemies of Islam? How was it possible to engage in merrymaking with the kaafir priest and his kuffaar entourage? The kaafir priest had even utilized the merrymaking moments for dinning the ears of Muslims with his preaching of shirk and kufr.
Hadhrat Sufyaan Thauri (Rahmatullah alayh) said about 13 centuries ago:
“A crevice (for the entry of baatil into the Ummah) has opened up, but now the opening is so massive that an ocean of baatil is flooding through. Who can now prevent it?”
This was the lament of one of Islam’s greatest Authorities in all fields of Shar’i Uloom more than 13 centuries ago. The incremental expansion of kufr from even the Musaajid is satanism which is here to stay. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has predicted it, and his predictions are signs of the Truth of Nubuwwat. This development of shaitaaniyat and kufr initiated by molvis right inside the Musjid is a sure sign of the imminence of the Hour of Qiyaamah.
The argument of Najraan – of the Christian delegation to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) – on the basis of which this shaitaani Mudhil, Mumtaazud Devil, abortively seeks to justify his act of blatant and brazen kufr perpetrated in a place which is supposed to be among the holiest bastions of the Deen, is absolutely satanic and putrid. This argument is bereft of the slightest vestige of credulity. It is Ibleesi twaddle with which the Murtad is attempting to bamboozle the juhala Muslims who sat through the kufr propagation soiling and polluting their hearts with the kufr which the priest dinned into their ears.
It will be salubrious if the Murtad Mudhil elaborates on the Najraani episode. But never will he be able to present the truth of this anecdote. To dispel the baatil and falsehood which the Murtad attempted to spin in his bid to pull wool over the eyes of the ignorant and unwary, we present here some aspects pertaining to the Christian delegation which had visited Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
When the delegation reached Madinah Munawwarah, its members removed their travel dress and donned their gaudily adorned garments and golden rings. According to their proudful style, their long cloaks dragged on the ground as they walked. In this state of pomp and show they came to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and greeted him. Our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not respond to their greeting.
They endeavoured the whole day to engage Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) in conversation, but he rebuffed them. He did not speak with them. Then they set out in search of Hadhrat Uthmaan (Radhiyallahu anhu) and Hadhrat Abdur Rahmaan Bin Auf (Radhiyallahu anh). They were acquainted with these two senior Sahaabah. After they located the two, the Christians said:
“O Uthmaan! O Abdur Rahmaan! Your Nabi had written a letter to us. We have come to respond to his letter. We came and greeted, but he refused to respond to our greeting. We endeavoured the entire day to speak to him, but he avoided us. What is your advice? Do you advise that we should return?”
Both these Sahaabah sought the advice of Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) who said: “They should remove their gaudy garments and their golden rings, and don their travel dress, then go to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).”
This advice was heeded. The delegation acted accordingly. Then when they came into the presence of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and greeted, he returned their greeting. Then Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“I take an oath by That Being Who has sent me with the Truth! They (i.e. the delegation) had come to me the first time with the adornment of Iblees….” Then Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) engaged them in discussion. Before the delegation had arrived, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had issued the following ultimatum to them:
“Accept Islam, and you will be granted safety…….I am calling you away from the worship of slaves to the worship of Allah Ta’ala. I call you away from the friendship of slaves to the Friendship of Allah. If you refuse (to accept this demand), then payment of Jizyah will be incumbent on you. If you refuse (even payment of Jizyah), then take notice of war. Was-salaam”
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had also informed them:
“Three things impede you from accepting Islam: Worshipping the cross; devouring the flesh of swines, and believing that Isaa (Alayhis salaam) is the son of Allah.”
Regarding the delegation of Najraan, the Qur’aan Majeed states:
“The Truth is from your Rabb (O Muhammad!). Therefore, do not be among those who doubt. Whoever disputes with you in this matter (of the Haqq) after Knowledge (by Wahi) has come to you, then say: ‘Come! Let us call our sons and your sons, our wives and your wives, ourselves and yourselves, then we shall supplicate sincerely (and earnestly) invoking the La’nat (Curse) of Allah on the liars.”
(Aal-e-Imraan, 59 and 60)
This was the challenge which Allah Ta’ala commanded Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to issue to the Najraani Christians. The delegation had asked Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) why he was speaking ill of ‘their person’……………….Upon this Allah Ta’ala revealed the aforementioned Aayat of Mubaahalah. However, the Christians were scared, hence refused to take up the challenge.
Far, very far from any bootlicking and listening to any sermon of kufr from the Najraani delegation, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) imposed on them an annual Jizyah tax of 2,000 suits of garments in the month of Rajab. Thereafter, Nabi-e-Kareem (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) told them that if they had engaged him in the Mubaahalah to invoke the La’nat of Allah Azza Wa Jal, the entire Christian population of Najraan would have been destroyed. All of them would have been transformed into apes and swines, and the entire region would have been consumed by a raging fire. Thereafter, not even birds would perch on the trees of Najraan.
This then is the story of the Najraani delegation which the Murtad Mudhil and all other munaafiq bootlickers and modernists cite to justify kuffaar presence in the Musaajid. Is there any semblance of bootlicking by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) in this episode? Did Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) obfuscate the Haqq and allow the Christians to insult the Qur’aan and Islam, and to din the ears of Muslims with such kufr and blasphemy which insult the Deen, the Qur’aan and the Nabi? Did Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) invite the Najraanis to propagate their kufr and shirk in the Musjid?
By putridly and stupidly mentioning the Najraani delegation, this Murtad and all other mudhilleen molvis and modernists hoodwink the ignorant masses into the satanic understanding that the Najraani delegation was in a dominant position and had dictated to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Muslimeen. In addition to there being not the slightest vestige of bootlicking, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) acquitted himself with belligerency. He refused to greet them. He refused to speak to them the entire day when they arrived. They were constrained to disrobe and don their old, dirty travel garments. They were issued the Mubaahalah challenge with the consequences of being transformed into apes and pigs, and finally an annula tax was imposed on them under threat of Jihad.
Is there any resemblance between the anecdote of Najraan and the bootlicking kufr ceremong of the kaafir priest inside the Musjid at the invitation of the Murtad, Mudhil Agent of Iblees? Every Muslim can now quite easily understand the farce and fallacy of the Najraani analogy drawn by the jaahil murtad sheikhush shaitaan to justify the sermon of kufr inside the Musjid.
“O People of Imaan! If you follow the kuffaar, they will (only) turn you on your heels (to renege and become murtads), then you will become losers (in this dunya and in the Aakhirat).” (Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 149)
“But in fact, He (Allah) is your Friend, and He is the best of friends.”
(Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 150)
“Verily, those who have believed (had become Muslims), then they committed kufr, then again they believed, then again committed kufr, then they increased the kufr (as this Agent of Iblees has done), Allah will not forgive them nor will He guide them to the (Straight) Path.”
(An-Nisaa’, Aayat 137)
“Convey to the munaafiqeen (such as the kuffaar bootlickers) the tidings that most certainly for them there is a Painful Chastisement. They (the munaafiqeen) are those who take as friends the kaafireen (just as the mumtazul baatil character has perpetrated) besides the Mu’mineen. What! Are they searching for honour from them (from the kaafireen)? (Know!) that verily all honour belongs to Allah.” (An-Nisaa’, 138 and 139)
May Allah Ta’ala protect our Imaan and may He keep us steadfast on Siraatul Mustaqeem and take our Souls at the end of this earthly sojourn with our Imaan intact. “Imaan is suspended between fear and hope.” No one knows what the morrow holds for him. Just reflect! Meditate on the abyss of kufr into which the Imaam of this UK Musjid has plunged into. It is indeed fearful. We seek Allah’s Protection from the evil of our nafs and the snares of Iblees. “Salaam on those who follow Allah’s Guidance.”
15 Rabiul Awwal 1440 – 23 November 2018